|
THE ARIZONA CONSERVATIVE |
||||
|
The Subprime Home Mortgage Collapse...A Primer
Tax Cuts for the Rich? Arizona's state government is spending $855 per second |
FISCAL MATTERS
QUOTABLE
“However it is
done, transferring wealth is not creating wealth. When government uses
transferred wealth to hire people, it is essentially transferring jobs
from the private sector -- not adding to the net number of jobs in the
economy.” People with low
skills or little experience usually get paid low wages. Passing a
minimum wage law does not make them any more valuable. At a higher
wage, it can just make them expendable. Raising the minimum wage in
the midst of a recession was guaranteed to increase unemployment among
the young -- and it has. None of this is peculiar to the current
administration. The Roosevelt administration created huge numbers of
government jobs during the 1930s -- and yet unemployment remained in
double digits throughout FDR's first two terms. "The fact is
there is no pile of TARP money sitting there unused that would be
essentially free to use for new programs," he explains. "Any dollar
spent on a new jobless program is one dollar less that the taxpayer
has, and one dollar less that could be used for deficit reduction."
There is another
way of reducing the cost of government-imposed mandates. That is by
hiring temporary workers, to whom the mandates do not apply. The
number of temporary workers hired has increased for the fourth
consecutive month, even though there are millions of unemployed people
who could be hired for regular jobs, if it were not for the mandates
that politicians have imposed. FACTS Unemployment shot up in 2009 from 7.7 percent in January to 10.1 percent in October before settling at 10 percent in December. Behind those percentages were more than 4.1 million people who lost their jobs during the year. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that’s the most job losses in a year since 1940. Bureau of Labor Statistics In its
“Long Term Fiscal
Outlook” report, the GAO states that “absent policy actions aimed
at reforming the key drivers of our structural deficits – health
spending and Social Security – the federal government faces
unsustainable growth in debt. The longer that action to deal with the
federal government’s long-term fiscal outlook is delayed, the greater
the risk that the eventual changes will be disruptive and
destabilizing.” The Federal Reserve's role in the
housing bust cannot be exaggerated. The Federal Reserve slashed
interest rates repeatedly from January 2001 to June of 2003, from 6.5
percent to 1 percent. This led to inflation, so the Federal Reserve
began to steadily raise interest rates, up to 5.25 percent by June of
2006. When the Federal Reserve abandoned its role as steward of the
monetary system and used interest rates to artificially and
inappropriately manipulate the housing market, it interfered with
normal market conditions and contributed to the destabilization of the
economy.
|
|||