Crump Considers Run for Attorney General, Denounces
Horne Remarks
Oct. 9, 2009
PHOENIX -- Arizona Rep.
Sam Crump today announced that, if he runs for and is elected Attorney
General, he
would be accessible to all Arizonans. Crump’s comments were a slam aimed
at Tom Horne, who said his top
campaign donors would have regular access to him if he's elected.
Crump said: “I find it incredible that an attorney and public official
would have such a blind eye to the ethical
violations such a scheme creates. If I run for Attorney General and am
elected, I would seek to make the office
open and accessible to all Arizonans.”
Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas is running for Attorney General,
and 13 months out from the election
the saber-rattling is definitely beginning.
Crump said Horne's
pay-for-access promise is especially offensive since he is seeking to
become Attorney General,
which is the office responsible for ensuring ethical behavior by
government officials.
“If he wants to have
lunch with his country club cronies, that’s his business,” Crump said.
“But to publicly promise regular
access to them when he is the State’s chief law enforcement officer is
outrageous.”
Crump also noted a call by elections officials for legislation that
would remove any ambiguity about the impropriety of such
promises by candidates. “As Chairman of the Government Committee in the
House of Representatives, I can assure you
that I will be looking into this matter and will likely be the sponsor
of such legislation. Unfortunately, Mr. Horne has shown it
is necessary.”
Crump said he found it sadly humorous that Horne stated he got the idea
for his pay-for-access plan from former Governor
Janet Napolitano. “The last thing this State needs is an Attorney
General who gets his ideas from Janet Napolitano,” Crump
said.
Elections refresh and cleanse our political system. They ratify or
overturn the policies of public officials. In the same stroke, they
flush out of office those who stray too much from the will of the
people. Among those candidates and parties that don’t fare well,
elections force introspection and reform.
While Republicans enjoyed some notable successes in Arizona in 2008, we
were not nationally what we would term the “prevailing party.” And so
it’s appropriate for the GOP to check and update its inventory of ideas
and policies while the losses of last year still sting.
Illegal immigration rightly will continue to be a dominant issue in
Arizona politics for years to come. Crime and illegal immigration
finally are down in Maricopa County—a great success for our community
that seemed impossible only a short time ago. Much remains to be done on
this front, which means I’ll still draw plenty of protests and cross
words and do my part to provide fodder for the newspaper industry.
Yet Arizonans will insist that Republicans be about more than one issue.
They are right to do so.
I believe Republicans must articulate a new and cogent list of
priorities for the people of our state and nation. The issues below take
account of our times and are predicated on strong and forthright
leadership.
Public safety first. Violent drug cartels have made the
U.S.-Mexican border one of the most dangerous population zones on earth.
While moving beyond a narrow focus on immigration and addressing a full
agenda of public issues, Republicans must remain a party well known for
its seriousness in protecting our homes and our borders from criminal
offenders.
Free but fair markets. The recent economic crisis, painful though
it is, offers an opportunity for reform and accountability. Government
officials must enforce our laws to protect citizens from fraud and
predatory lending. Republicans should heed public complaints about the
ridiculous bonuses given certain CEOs and not dismiss them as Democratic
rhetoric. It’s legitimate to ask whether corporate boards of directors
have become so insulated from regular shareholder oversight that
executive compensation has become a “good ol’ boys” racket.
As the government props up banks and indentures future generations of
Americans with colossal federal deficit spending, we should insist at a
minimum that henceforth, banks and lending institutions possess enough
capital to properly underwrite their loans. In turn, banks shouldn’t be
pressured into lending to questionable applicants out of either runaway
short-term greed or fear of drawing civil-rights lawsuits.
Excellence in education. Our public schools, for all their
problems, are a great national institution that must be strengthened and
preserved. I am the product of them, as are my wife and children. Still,
parents who desire a different way of raising their children—one with a
different pedagogical or spiritual focus—shouldn’t be corralled into
them. To enact choice in education while nurturing our public schools
requires that we find a way to recognize and reward fully the many great
teachers in our public schools. By the same measure, the small number of
teachers who fill too much of their class time with movies and casual
“bull sessions” should be identified and held to higher standards.
Establishing an external process for spot-checking or auditing classroom
performance is one possible fix.
Schools must be a safe haven for children. Teachers and school employees
who exploit their positions to have sexual relations with school
children must be dealt with harshly.
Our public universities should be robust and properly endowed. In
return, they also should be centers of unfettered inquiry and tolerance,
not redoubts of political correctness in which certain viewpoints are
penalized in classroom discussions or faculty hiring decisions.
Good stewardship of the environment. The Valley should not accept
as inevitable the air pollution levels that blanket our beautiful
mountain ranges and desert environs. Confronting the special interests
responsible for this blight will take guts and tenacity, not unlike
what’s been required for the fight against illegal immigration. But as
we’ve seen, progress can be had for the price of serious political
leadership.
So too can we protect endangered species under federal and state law, so
that we might ensure a healthy biodiversity and the survival of plant
and animal life for future generations. This can be achieved while
upholding private property rights, so long as we are willing to
compensate properly for the environment we deserve.
True equality. President Obama was one of my classmates at
Harvard Law School (my career has been a political odyssey commencing
with sharing a seminar with him to serving proudly today alongside
America’s toughest sheriff). I join all decent Americans in taking pride
in the election of our first African-American president. Republicans
likewise have tapped Michael Steele as the first black chairman of the
Republican National Committee. These advances underscore the need to end
government policies that require or countenance preferences based on
race or other immutable characteristics.
My family is an example of what the future holds. My wife is
Mexican-American, my four children of Hispanic descent. Should my
children be able to take advantage of racial preferences in applying for
jobs, contracts or college admissions? I think not. Ultimately they will
have to make this choice for themselves. But the fact that this question
is being asked is a sign of just how much civil-rights victories and
demographic changes have eroded the rationale for existing
affirmative-action policies. As Arizona and America become increasingly
diverse—as our nation looks more and more like my family, something I
personally look forward to—such policies will become less defensible.
Republicans should be at the forefront of urging a sunset to these
well-intentioned but increasingly outmoded practices. We are now a
nation strong enough to trust in individual merit.
No tolerance for public corruption. Human nature being what it is,
politicians of all parties and persuasions are going to violate laws and
be corrupted by power. As it has turned out, it’s been my unsought duty
to investigate and prosecute more members of my own political party than
of others. When Republicans are duly charged with crimes, their fellow
Republicans must resist the temptation to circle the wagons around their
friends and professional colleagues. We must make it clear that while no
party is unblemished by corruption, the GOP shall be known as the party
that won’t tolerate, facilitate or apologize for it once it comes to
light.
In his book Theodore Roosevelt on Leadership, James Strock (a Valley
resident) notes that at one point while he was a New York City police
commissioner, Roosevelt lamented there was not a single politician or
newspaper in the city that supported him. His complaint is of lasting
value. We profit by reminding ourselves that leadership is often a
lonely endeavor, the fruits of which take years to reap; and in the
meantime integrity and principle must be their own reward. Republicans
should remember this as they fashion an agenda that, while consulting
public sentiment, cannot aspire to universal favor and still remain
meaningful. Such disagreements, after all, are why we have political
parties.
And yet these big issues transcend parties. We must hope that in time,
they call forth leaders willing to do the same.