NEWS & COMMENTARY
AZ Right to Life Director Testifies to Legislative Committee on Fetal
Pain
By Shane Wikfors, Executive
Director, Arizona Right to Life
Jan. 25, 2006
Today, the Arizona House Health Committee passed a bill requiring
abortionists to inform women about the pain their unborn child
experiences during an abortion. The vote was 5-1. Several committee
members who were present during the hearing conveniently disappeared
prior to the vote.
Apparently, they did not want to go on the record
with this bill.
Following are my remarks to the committee on House Bill 2254:
Chairman Quelland, Members of the Health Committee, my name is Shane
Wikfors and I serve as the Executive Director of Arizona Right to Life
-- Arizona's oldest and largest pro-life organization and an affiliate
of the National Right to Life Committee.
At our core, Arizona Right to Life is a human rights organization whose
mission is to restore respect for and promote the protection of all
innocent human life -- ultimately, we speak for those who cannot speak
for themselves.
This is a human rights bill.
At a time when our society is engaged in a debate over human suffering
and the use of torture, abortion should be no exception.
A great consensus of pediatricians, anesthesiologists, pharmacologists,
obstetricians and neurobiologists have agreed upon 20 weeks after
conception as a threshold when a human fetus can feel pain. In fact,
between weeks 20 and 30, an unborn child has more pain receptors per
square inch than any other time, before or after birth, with only a very
thin layer of skin for protection.
During this point in pregnancy, the most common abortion performed is
called a dilation and evacuation procedure.
During this procedure, the abortion doctor literally tears apart the
body of the unborn child limb from limb. This is a horrific procedure
and one in which no anesthesia is administered.
In 2004, the Department of Health, Office of Vital Statistics reported
136 abortions performed in Arizona after the 20th week of gestational
age.
We can reasonably assume that the procedure used for these abortions
were either the dilation and evacuation method or the partial birth
abortion method.
136 unborn children died through an excruciating method of torture.
According to Arizona law, the destruction of unwanted animals requires
the use of methods that are humane. Arizona law requires the use of
either nitrogen gas, sodium pentobarbital or a derivation of sodium
pentobarbital. Interestingly, these methods also act as an anesthesia.
Arizona law also requires that even convicted criminals condemned to die
by lethal injection are executed in a manner far more humane than being
torn limb by limb.
Shockingly, the unborn are the only exception.
Mr. Chairman, Members of the Health Committee, this bill does not
restrict or prohibit abortion in any manner. It is pro-information,
pro-choice, pro-woman and pro-humane.
Women deserve to know their options, the truth and this bill does just
that.
In a day and age when we strive to bring common sense, decency and
humane treatment to our citizens, I ask that you not forget the most
vulnerable members of our society, the unborn.
I urge you to vote in support if House Bill 2254.
Thank you
Here's how the vote went down:
Amanda Aguirre - Absent during vote but attended the hearing
Dave Bradley - No
Jennifer Burns - Yes
Ted Carpenter - Yes
Laura Knaperek - Yes
Linda Lopez - Absent during the vote
Colette Rosati - Yes
Doug Quelland - Yes
Rick Murpy - Absent during the entire hearing but would have voted "Yes"
Home |News
|State Briefs |Editorials|Letters |Key
Legislation |Privacy Policy |Contact
Us